The claims surrounding Zaila and Lughaya, particularly by Ciise from Ethiopia, raise important questions about historical narratives and identity. Zaila, historically known as a significant port city, has often been regarded as a cradle of knowledge and the entry point for Islam into the region. Its rich history is intertwined with trade and cultural exchange, making it a focal point of civilization in the Horn of Africa.

One might question why, if Ciise claims of ancient civilisation hold water, there is a lack of widely recognized historical evidence or notable contributions from Ciise alleged civilisations. The absence of documented achievements or a collective identity could suggest that the narratives surrounding these claims may not be true as asserted. Furthermore, the Somali people have a rich oral tradition, especially in poetry, which serves as a historical record of their culture and societal values. The works of renowned poets from the Gadaboursi, Isaaq, and Harti clans highlight the longstanding relationship these communities have with their land. The verses celebrating Gadaboursi livestock, heritage, and historical figures reflect a deep-rooted connection to these regions that has been passed down through generations.

The question then arises: if the claims of ancient civilizations by Ciise are valid, where are the corresponding cultural artifacts or historical documents? The absence of such evidence, particularly when contrasted with the rich oral literature of the Gadaboursi and other Somali clans, raises doubts about the legitimacy of their claims. Moreover, the assertion of land ownership is often tied to historical presence and cultural continuity. The Gadaboursi have laid claim to Zaila, Lughaya, and Awdal for centuries, establishing a societal structure and identity that is well-documented in their poetry,oral histories, and treaties sign with colonial power. The sudden emergence of Ciise claims prompts further inquiry into the motivations behind these assertions. Is it simply a matter of historical revisionism, or is there a deeper narrative at play, potentially invoking divine justification for land claims ( promess land?)

Ultimately, the rich tapestry of Somali history, particularly in regions like Zaila and Lughaya, deserves recognition and respect. It is crucial to engage with these narratives thoughtfully, ensuring that the voices of those who have historically inhabited and cherished these lands are heard and acknowledged. The legacy of the Gadaboursi and their cultural contributions should remain central to any discussion regarding the history and identity of this region.

By: BURAALE XINIIN